Lesson 3 of 8
The refinancing date is the risk
The same debt with its maturities pushed out is a different balance sheet. One filer with nothing due for two years, and why the amount was never the question.
By Javier Sanz
Founder of ValueScreener. Built Ninety Nine, a securities services provider, and sold it to a tier-one global bank; ran operations and internationalization at Alpaca, the brokerage API.
Who writes thisEditorial processLinkedIn (opens in a new tab)X (opens in a new tab)
In one minute
- Fixed-rate debt reprices in full on the day it has to be replaced, so the maturity date is the reset date.
- A company that has pushed its maturities out has bought time, which is the only thing that helps in a closed market.
- Two balance sheets with the same total debt and different schedules are different objects, and only the note says which is which.
The previous lesson found a wall. This one is about the other shape, and about why a company spends money to produce it.
One filer's five-year schedule, as filed in two consecutive years
- Y1, FY24 filing107$m
- Y2, FY24 filing607$m
- Y1, FY25 filing0$m
- Y2, FY25 filing0$m
What the schedule says
In the annual report for the fiscal year ended 28 August 2025, the five-year maturity schedule reads: nothing in year one, nothing in year two, 542 million dollars in year three, 1,684 million in year four, 1,955 million in year five, and 7,400 million after year five. The total is 11,581 million.
A year earlier the same schedule read 107 million, 607, 1,780, 1,493 and 700, with 6,750 million beyond, for a total of 11,437 million.
Total principal barely moved: up 144 million, about 1.3 percent. The first two rungs went to zero.
Why that is not a small change
Because a maturity is a compulsory transaction. When fixed-rate debt comes due, the company either has the cash or goes back to the market, and going back to the market means accepting whatever terms exist on that date.
A company with nothing due for two years does not have to accept any terms for two years. That is the entire benefit, and it is a benefit about time rather than about cost. In a market where credit is freely available it is worth almost nothing, because the refinancing would have been routine. In a market where it is not, it is worth a great deal.
Which is the clearest example in this whole track of the sentence the curriculum was built around: nothing about the obligation changed, and which figure is load bearing did.
Liquidity against solvency, one more time
The distressed course draws this distinction and it lands here exactly. A wall is a liquidity question: can the company meet a dated obligation. Total leverage is a solvency question: are the assets worth more than the claims on them.
A company can fail the first while comfortably passing the second, and a refinancing that cannot be done is how that happens. Which is why a leverage ratio, computed from balances, will not see it coming and a maturity schedule will.
What a reader should take from this
Two habits. When you read a total debt figure, find out when it is due before forming any view of it. And when a company refinances, read what changed in the schedule rather than what changed in the total, because the total is usually the part that did not move.
Check yourself
A filer's total debt rose 1.3 percent while the first two years of its maturity schedule went to zero. What changed?
- Almost nothing, since the total barely moved
- The company removed two compulsory transactions from the next two years, which is a change in timing rather than in amount
- Its interest cost fell
Show the answer
Answer: B.
A maturity is a compulsory transaction. Removing two of them buys two years in which no terms have to be accepted.Why is having no maturities for two years worth more in some conditions than others?
- Because interest rates move
- Because the benefit is about not having to accept terms, which is worth little when credit is freely available and a great deal when it is not
- Because covenants are tested annually
Show the answer
Answer: B.
The obligation did not change. What changed is which figure on the balance sheet decides, which is the whole content of a credit reading.Why will a leverage ratio not see a refinancing problem coming?
- Because it is computed from stale figures
- Because it is computed from balances and answers a solvency question, while a refinancing is a dated liquidity question
- Because it excludes lease obligations
Show the answer
Answer: B.
A company can pass a solvency test comfortably and still be unable to complete a dated transaction. The schedule is what shows the date.Sources
- Micron Technology, Inc., annual reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended 29 August 2024, accession 0000723125-24-000027, filed 4 October 2024, and 28 August 2025, accession 0000723125-25-000028, filed 3 October 2025, for the five-year maturity schedules and totals.
What this leaves out
- This is a heterodox tradition. The mainstream account of the same phenomenon differs, and nothing here is a forecast or a view on any security.
- The two schedules are dated from two different fiscal year ends, so the rungs refer to different calendar years and the columns are not directly comparable rung by rung.
- The schedule covers long-term debt principal. Finance lease obligations, which this filer reports separately, are not in these totals.
- Nothing here is a view on Micron or on any security.