ValueScreener

Lesson 6 of 7

The Altman Z-Score as a tool

The Altman Z-Score folds five ratios into one number, fitted to separate bankrupt manufacturers from healthy ones. It was never fitted on banks.

Javier Sanz, founder

By Javier Sanz

Founder of ValueScreener. Built Ninety Nine, a securities services provider, and sold it to a tier-one global bank; ran operations and internationalization at Alpaca, the brokerage API.

Who writes thisEditorial processLinkedIn (opens in a new tab)X (opens in a new tab)

In one minute

  • The Z-Score adds five weighted ratios into one number, built in 1968 to separate manufacturers that went bankrupt from ones that did not.
  • The zones commonly quoted put a Z above 2.99 in the safe range, below 1.81 in the distressed range, and the band between in a grey zone.
  • It was fitted on public manufacturers, and it reads oddly on banks, utilities and asset-light service companies, whose balance sheets look nothing like the sample it was built on.

The Z-Score is five ordinary ratios, each already computable from a company's own statements. Altman combined them into one number, with weights fitted so that number separated his sample of failed and healthy manufacturers as cleanly as possible.

Building one company's Z-Score from its five terms

  • X1: working capital ÷ assets, weighted 1.2×0.12
  • X2: retained earnings ÷ assets, weighted 1.4×+0.28
  • X3: EBIT ÷ assets, weighted 3.3×+0.33
  • X4: market value of equity ÷ liabilities, weighted 0.6×+0.60
  • X5: sales ÷ assets, weighted 1.0×+1.20
  • Z-Score= 2.53
Illustrative round numbers, not any company's filings.

Five ratios, one score

Each of the five inputs proxies for a different way a company can be in trouble, and Altman weighted each one by how much it separated his sample of failed and non-failed companies.

TermRatioWhat it proxies for
X1Working capital ÷ total assetsShort-term liquidity
X2Retained earnings ÷ total assetsHow much of the balance sheet is built from earnings kept over the company's life
X3EBIT ÷ total assetsOperating profitability
X4Market value of equity ÷ total liabilitiesHow far the market's own value of the equity would have to fall before liabilities exceeded it
X5Sales ÷ total assetsHow hard the assets are working

The zones commonly quoted

The zones commonly quoted from Altman's 1968 model put a score above 2.99 in the safe range and below 1.81 in the distressed range. The band between is called the grey zone, where failed and healthy companies overlapped. A Z of 2.53 sits inside it.

What it was never fitted on

Altman built the Z-Score on public manufacturing companies, and applying its weights outside that group is a different question, not a smaller version of the same one, as the prerequisite lesson on fitted scores sets out in general. Two of the five terms carry a further catch worth knowing on their own: X4 uses the market value of equity, so the score moves on days the accounts do not change at all, and X2 marks a young company down simply for being young, since it has had less time to build retained earnings.

Check yourself

A company scores a Z of 2.53. Where does that sit against Altman's original zones?

  1. In the safe zone, above 2.99
  2. In the grey zone, between 1.81 and 2.99
  3. In the distress zone, below 1.81

Show the answer

Answer: B.

The grey zone commonly quoted from Altman's 1968 model runs between 1.81 and 2.99. A score of 2.53 falls inside it, neither his clearest safe reading nor his clearest distress one.

Why does the Z-Score read oddly on a bank?

  1. Banks never have working capital
  2. The model was fitted on public manufacturers, whose balance sheets of plant and inventory look nothing like a bank's deposits and loans
  3. Banks carry too little debt for the score

Show the answer

Answer: B.

Altman fitted the Z-Score's weights on manufacturing companies. Applying the same weights to a bank's very different balance sheet is a different question from the one the model was built to answer.

What does the X4 term, market value of equity over total liabilities, proxy for?

  1. How efficiently assets generate sales
  2. How far the market's own value of the equity would have to fall before liabilities exceeded it
  3. How much of the balance sheet is retained earnings

Show the answer

Answer: B.

X4 compares the market's own value of the equity cushion against total liabilities, one market-based view of how much room the company has before it is technically insolvent.

Sources

  • Altman, Journal of Finance, 1968: the Z-Score, fitted on public manufacturers; zones at 1.81 and 2.99.

What this leaves out

  • The weights and zone boundaries are Altman's 1968 originals; several later variants exist for private and non-manufacturing companies and are not this lesson's subject.
  • The worked example uses round invented ratios chosen so the five contributions sum exactly to the total shown.
  • A Z-Score is a statistical pattern fitted on one historical sample, not a forecast for any specific company. It is not advice about any security.

The test, not the verdict

Lesson 6 of 7 of Credit for equity investors. It teaches the test and where its line came from. Whether anything you own sits on the right side of that line is not answered here: no holding of yours has been put through it.

Free audit

Research tool, not investment advice. See our methodology for how the product reads a filing and what it refuses to compute.

Once a week, what changed in the filings of US-listed companies, why it can matter to a thesis, and what deserves a closer review. Grounded in filings, not market noise.