Lesson 3 of 8
Obligations that are not debt
Receivables sold to a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary, notes with no parent recourse, and a contract a customer refused. None is in total debt.
By Javier Sanz
Founder of ValueScreener. Built Ninety Nine, a securities services provider, and sold it to a tier-one global bank; ran operations and internationalization at Alpaca, the brokerage API.
Who writes thisEditorial processLinkedIn (opens in a new tab)X (opens in a new tab)
In one minute
- A receivables securitisation moves assets to a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary, so the lender's claim sits on those receivables rather than on the company.
- A subsidiary's notes can be non-recourse to the parent and structurally subordinated to that subsidiary's own creditors, which two companies inside one group do not share.
- A take-or-pay contract is an asset to the seller and an obligation to the buyer, and it is worth exactly what the counterparty is willing and able to pay.
Total debt is a line. The obligations that decide a distressed outcome are frequently somewhere else in the same document.
Three obligations, and where each one is disclosed
- 1Receivables soldTo a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary, without recourse
- 2Notes at a subsidiaryNon-recourse to the parent, structurally subordinated
- 3Take-or-pay contractAn asset, until the counterparty refuses
Receivables sold to a subsidiary that cannot fail with you
Marathon Petroleum's fiscal 2025 filing describes a trade receivables securitisation facility with 100 million dollars of committed borrowing and letter of credit capacity, running to 30 September 2027.
The mechanics are the point. Wholly owned subsidiaries sell the trade receivables they generate, without recourse, to another wholly owned, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary, which pledges them to the lenders. Borrowings can never exceed the balance of eligible receivables.
For an equity investor three things follow. The receivables backing that facility are not available to the company's other creditors. The facility's size moves with the receivables balance, so it shrinks exactly when sales fall. And "without recourse" is a legal statement about who bears the loss if the receivables do not pay, which is worth reading rather than assuming.
A guarantee that is absent
The same filing states that the notes issued by the group's partnership subsidiary are unsecured, unsubordinated obligations of that subsidiary, non-recourse to the parent and its other subsidiaries, and structurally subordinated to the indebtedness of the subsidiary's own subsidiaries.
Three different positions in one sentence. The parent's creditors cannot reach the subsidiary's assets ahead of the subsidiary's creditors. The subsidiary's noteholders cannot reach the parent at all. And the subsidiary's noteholders rank behind the creditors of the level below them.
Consolidated debt to equity sees none of this. It adds every borrowing in the group and divides by one equity figure, which is the right ratio only if every obligation has the same access to every asset.
A contract that binds a customer, until it does not
A take-or-pay contract appears in filings as a strength, and it is one. It is also a claim on a counterparty, which makes it worth the counterparty's ability and willingness to perform. When a customer is itself under pressure, the contract converts from revenue into litigation, and the filing is where that conversion is disclosed.
The obligation runs both ways: read the same disclosure from the buyer's side and it is a fixed cost that does not fall when volumes do, which is exactly the obligation that breaks a covenant in a downturn.
Where to look
| Obligation | Where it is disclosed |
|---|---|
| Receivables securitisation or factoring | The liquidity section and the debt note, usually under its own heading |
| Non-recourse subsidiary debt | The debt note, in the sentence describing the guarantors |
| Take-or-pay and purchase commitments | The commitments and contingencies note, and the business section |
| Guarantees of another party's debt | The commitments note |
Check yourself
What does selling receivables to a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary do for the lender?
- Nothing, it is an accounting presentation
- It puts their claim on the receivables themselves rather than on a company that could fail
- It guarantees the receivables will be collected
Show the answer
Answer: B.
That is the whole purpose of the structure, and it means those receivables are not available to the company's other creditors.A subsidiary's notes are non-recourse to the parent and structurally subordinated to the subsidiary's own subsidiaries. What does consolidated debt to equity show?
- The subordination, through a higher ratio
- Nothing, because it adds every borrowing in the group and divides by one equity figure
- Only the parent's obligations
Show the answer
Answer: B.
A consolidated ratio assumes every obligation has equal access to every asset, which is precisely what these structures are designed to prevent.What is a take-or-pay contract worth to the seller?
- Its face value, since the customer is contractually bound
- Whatever the counterparty is able and willing to pay, which the filings will disclose when it changes
- Nothing, since such contracts are rarely enforced
Show the answer
Answer: B.
It is a claim on a counterparty. One named customer's refusal to accept tons turned part of this company's contracted revenue into a dispute, and the filing says so.Sources
- Marathon Petroleum, Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 31 December 2025, filed 2026-02-26, accession 0001510295-26-000009: the trade receivables securitisation facility, and the non-recourse and structural subordination language on the partnership's senior notes.
- SunCoke Energy, Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 31 December 2025, filed 2026-02-20, accession 0001514705-26-000010: the long-term take-or-pay agreements, their named customers, and the disclosed breach.
What this leaves out
- These three are examples of shapes, not a complete list. Guarantees, receivable factoring without a securitisation, and supplier finance programmes all sit in the same blind spot.
- The disclosures are as filed at one date. A facility's size, its term and its counterparties all change.
- A disclosed breach is a statement by one party to a contract. The filing reports what the company says it was notified of, and nothing is settled here.
- Nothing here is advice about any security.