ValueScreener

Lesson 9 of 9

Real against nominal

US consumer prices rose 38.6 percent in the ten years to July 2026. A return stated without an inflation basis is not yet a number.

Javier Sanz, founder

By Javier Sanz

Founder of ValueScreener. Built Ninety Nine, a securities services provider, and sold it to a tier-one global bank; ran operations and internationalization at Alpaca, the brokerage API.

Who writes thisEditorial processLinkedIn (opens in a new tab)X (opens in a new tab)

In one minute

  • A nominal return counts dollars. A real return counts what those dollars buy.
  • Converting between them is a division, not a subtraction, and the shortcut drifts as rates rise.
  • A return with no stated basis is ambiguous, and over a decade the ambiguity is large enough to reverse a conclusion.

Two figures can both be called a return. One is the change in the number of dollars. The other is the change in what those dollars purchase. Over one year the difference is small enough to ignore in conversation. Over ten it is not.

The US consumer price index, July 2016 to July 2026

  • CPI-U, July of each year
Show the numbers
CPI-U, July of each year
2016240.101
2017244.243
2018251.214
2019255.802
2020258.352
2021271.903
2022294.913
2023304.609
2024313.569
2025322.169
2026332.813
CPI for All Urban Consumers, all items, US city average, seasonally adjusted. The index rose 38.61 percent over the decade, which is 3.32 percent a year.Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics series CUSR0000SA0, as stored by this product on 13 September 2026.

The conversion

The real return is the nominal growth factor divided by the inflation factor, minus one. This relation between a nominal rate, a real rate and inflation is usually called the Fisher relation.

Real return equals 1 + nominal return divided by 1 + inflation.

Example1.0496 / 1.0332 = 1.0159, so 1.59 percent

The familiar shortcut is to subtract: 4.96 minus 3.32 is 1.64 percent. That is close, and it is close for a reason. The two forms differ by the product of the real rate and the inflation rate, which is small when both are small and stops being small when either is not.

The decade, measured

The index stood at 240.101 in July 2016 and 332.813 in July 2026. The ratio is 1.38614, so prices rose 38.61 percent over the ten years, which compounds to 3.3191 percent a year.

What it does to a long comparison

One dollar earning 4.96 percent a year for ten years becomes 1.6227 dollars. Divide that by the 1.38614 the price index rose and the purchasing power is 1.1707: a real gain of 17.07 percent over the whole decade, not 62.27 percent. Nearly three quarters of the nominal gain bought nothing.

That is not an argument about any investment. It is an argument about labels. A return quoted as "62 percent over ten years" and a return quoted as "17 percent over ten years" can be the same number measured on two bases, and only the version that names its basis can be checked.

Where the basis usually goes missing

Three places. A long-run market return quoted without saying whether it is real or nominal. A growth rate in a valuation model, where discounting a nominal cash flow at a real rate overstates value and the reverse understates it. And an inflation figure applied to a company whose costs do not move with a general consumer index at all.

Keep the basis consistent on both sides of every comparison. The arithmetic does not care which one you pick. It cares that you picked the same one twice.

Check yourself

Inflation runs at 3 percent and a holding returns 8 percent nominal. What is the real return?

  1. Exactly 5.00 percent
  2. About 4.85 percent
  3. About 5.24 percent

Show the answer

Answer: B.

1.08 divided by 1.03 is 1.04854. Subtracting gives 5 percent, which is 15 basis points too generous, and the error grows with both rates.

US consumer prices rose 38.61 percent over the ten years to July 2026. A dollar of 2016 purchasing power needs to become how much by 2026 to break even?

  1. 1.0332
  2. 1.3861
  3. 3.3191

Show the answer

Answer: B.

The index went from 240.101 to 332.813, a ratio of 1.38614. The 3.32 percent figure is the annual rate that compounds to it over ten years.

You discount a cash flow forecast that already includes price rises. Which rate should you use?

  1. A real rate
  2. A nominal rate
  3. Either, they give the same answer

Show the answer

Answer: B.

The basis must match on both sides. A nominal cash flow discounted at a real rate is discounted too lightly, and the error compounds with the horizon.

Sources

  • US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, all items, US city average, seasonally adjusted, series CUSR0000SA0. Values read from this product's stored copy of that series on 13 September 2026.
  • US Department of the Treasury, Daily Treasury Par Yield Curve Rates, session of 11 September 2026: the 4.96 percent nominal rate used in the worked example.
  • Damodaran, Investment Valuation: the requirement that cash flows and discount rates share a basis.

What this leaves out

  • The consumer price index measures a general basket. It is not the inflation any single household or any single company experiences, and a company whose input costs move differently will not be described by it.
  • The series used here is the seasonally adjusted one. The unadjusted series differs slightly month to month and converges over a decade.
  • Index values are revised by the statistical agency. The figures here are the values held on the date stated.
  • Nothing here is advice about any security.

The tool, not the work

Lesson 9 of 9 of Financial mathematics. It teaches a piece of the arithmetic or one of the rules. It is something you work with rather than work that has been done: no company has been put through it on this page, least of all one of yours.

Free audit
  • The average that lies is the other way an average return can describe something that did not happen.
  • Methodology shows the dated inputs this product borrows from outside the filings, including the price index used here.

Research tool, not investment advice. See our methodology for how the product reads a filing and what it refuses to compute.

Once a week, what changed in the filings of US-listed companies, why it can matter to a thesis, and what deserves a closer review. Grounded in filings, not market noise.