ValueScreener

Lesson 1 of 7

The 1929 crash

Borrowed money and a speculative mania ended in the 1929 crash, and shaped the securities laws and the margin of safety that followed.

Javier Sanz, founder

By Javier Sanz

Founder of ValueScreener. Built Ninety Nine, a securities services provider, and sold it to a tier-one global bank; ran operations and internationalization at Alpaca, the brokerage API.

Who writes thisEditorial processLinkedIn (opens in a new tab)X (opens in a new tab)

In one minute

  • Borrowed money let buyers own far more stock than their own cash covered, so a price fall could erase the loan and the buyer's own money with it.
  • The crash of late October 1929 took a handful of trading days. The three-year decline after it is what reshaped how a generation read a price.
  • Congress answered with disclosure rules, and Graham and Dodd answered with a method: price a business from its own filed numbers, not from the crowd's mood.

The 1929 crash was not a single bad day. It was the end of a multi-year rise built partly on money buyers had borrowed, followed by a decline that ran for years and reset how investors judged a price for a generation after it.

From the crash to the method built to answer it

  1. 1928Buying on borrowed moneyA rising market makes a loan against stock look easy to carry, and buying with borrowed money is common practice.
  2. October 1929The crashPrices fall hard over a few weeks. Loans that looked safe when prices rose are called, forcing more stock onto a market that already has too many sellers.
  3. 1932The bottomThe decline runs for close to three more years before shares find a floor, the stretch that did the lasting damage to how the era's investors thought about a price.
  4. 1933Securities ActCongress requires a public company to disclose the numbers behind a security it sells, answering the information gap the crash exposed.
  5. 1934Two answers, one yearThe Securities Exchange Act creates the SEC to oversee the exchanges and gives the Federal Reserve the power to cap borrowing against stock; Graham and Dodd publish Security Analysis, a method for pricing a business from its filed numbers.
Source: Securities Act of 1933; Securities Exchange Act of 1934; Graham and Dodd, Security Analysis, first published 1934.

Borrowed money cuts both ways

A loan against stock multiplies a gain while prices rise, and it multiplies a loss the same way once they fall. The buyer's own cash sits behind the loan, so it is the first thing to go.

A crash is days. A bear market is years.

The crash days of late October 1929 are what people remember, but the decline that followed ran for the better part of three years. A few days of falling prices and a multi-year decline are different lessons: the first is about a market's mood, the second is about what a business is actually worth while the mood keeps changing.

What the law changed

Before 1933, a company selling stock to the public owed investors no federal standard of filed numbers. The Securities Act of 1933 made disclosure a legal requirement. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 created the SEC to oversee the exchanges those securities trade on. Neither act tells a buyer what a business is worth. Both make the numbers a buyer needs to work that out a matter of public record.

What Graham took from it

Graham lived through the crash and the years after it. Chapter 3 of the revised Intelligent Investor sets the era inside a century of market history. His answer, in chapter 20, was the margin of safety: pay enough below your own estimate of value that an error in the estimate does not decide the outcome.

Check yourself

A margin account is 10 percent down. The stock falls 20 percent. What happens to the buyer's own money?

  1. It falls by 20 percent, matching the stock
  2. It is wiped out, and the buyer owes the lender more besides
  3. It is unaffected because the loan absorbs the fall

Show the answer

Answer: B.

A 10 percent down payment is a small cushion under a large loan. A 20 percent fall in the stock is twice that cushion, so it erases the buyer's money and leaves a debt on top of it.

What did the Securities Act of 1933 require of a company selling stock to the public?

  1. A guarantee that the stock could not lose value
  2. Disclosure of the numbers behind the security
  3. A ban on buying stock with borrowed money

Show the answer

Answer: B.

The Act made filed disclosure a legal requirement. It says nothing about whether a security is a good buy, only that the numbers behind it must be public.

What is the difference between the crash of late October 1929 and the years that followed it?

  1. There is no difference; the crash days were the whole event
  2. The crash days were a headline; the multi-year decline is what reshaped how investors priced a business
  3. The years that followed were a smaller, less important event

Show the answer

Answer: B.

A few days of falling prices tests a market's mood. The years that followed tested whether a price paid for a business could be justified by what the business actually earned, which is the harder and more lasting question.

Sources

  • Galbraith, The Great Crash, 1929, 1955.
  • Graham, The Intelligent Investor, revised edition 1973, chapter 3: a century of stock-market history.
  • Graham, The Intelligent Investor, revised edition 1973, chapter 20, on the margin of safety.
  • Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  • Fisher, Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits and Other Writings, on the "new era" belief and margin buying ahead of 1929.

What this leaves out

  • No index figures for 1929-32: the dated table starts in 1965.
  • The margin account and its figures are a round, invented illustration of the mechanism, not a record of any real account.
  • Nothing here is advice about borrowing to buy any security.

The method, not the running of it

Lesson 1 of 7 of Market history for investors. It teaches how the step is run. It does not run it on anything you own, and it cannot tell you the day a reason you bought on stops being true.

Free audit

Research tool, not investment advice. See our methodology for how the product reads a filing and what it refuses to compute.

Once a week, what changed in the filings of US-listed companies, why it can matter to a thesis, and what deserves a closer review. Grounded in filings, not market noise.