Four kinds of sourceSEC filingCompany statementMarket dataComputedWhat each means
SEC filingFiled with the SEC
Read from a statement the company filed with the SEC, with the form, fiscal year, filing date and accession beside it.
Company statementCompany statement
What the company says about itself in a filing: an 8-K item, the auditor, its own segment names.
Market dataMarket data
Prices, market value and what analysts publish, with the date they are as of.
ComputedComputed by ValueScreener
Worked out by us from the other three, with the inputs and the formula one press away. A score is a research output, not a rating or a recommendation.
Reading
1 of 10
Overview
What the business is, what it costs, and how it reads on four questions.
Market dataSEC filingComputed
Four questions, at a glance
Quality
Return on invested capital, after tax
n/aComputed
From the FY2025 filing
Why n/a
The debt total on file was summed from short-term debt, long-term debt and lease obligations, and at least one of those was never captured. An absent term is spent as a zero inside that sum, and this balance sheet does not show the term is empty, so we will not build a leverage ratio, an enterprise value or a return on capital on it, or rank the company on one.
Earnings are zero or negative, so a price to earnings multiple is not meaningful. A negative P/E is not a cheap company and a large positive one from a near-zero denominator is not an expensive one.
Free cash flow yield is -19.7% at the close of 2026-10-15 on FY2025 figures; the lines are 2.0%, 5.0% and 8.0%, set by convention, and this sits below the lowest.
Today, against the Software - Infrastructure industry (127 companies), -19.7% sits at the 18th percentile; the middle half of that group runs from -8.1% to 7.2%.
Is it safe
Current ratio was 0.61 in FY2025, in the band labelled "Short-term liabilities exceed short-term assets" (below 1.00), on lines anchored on Graham's defensive-investor criteria, suggesting short-term obligations above short-term assets.
Today, against the Software - Infrastructure industry (129 companies), 0.61 sits at the 11th percentile; the middle half of that group runs from 1.00 to 2.21.
Year by year against peers
Whether Tucows Inc.'s gross margin stayed above the median of the Software - Infrastructure industry, year by year. (FY2016 to FY2025, 10 fiscal years of Tucows Inc. with a comparable figure)
The direction
Which way Tucows Inc.'s gross margin has moved, and how steadily. (FY2016 to FY2025, 10 filed years of Tucows Inc.)
What could explain it
What in Tucows Inc.'s filed statements could explain the movements. (3 readings drawn from the statement lines Tucows Inc. filed)
What to check next
What to check next on Tucows Inc., and where in its filings. (4 questions for Tucows Inc.)
In one paragraph
One paragraph on Tucows Inc.'s returns, cash, balance sheet and price. (7 of sixteen figures read for Tucows Inc.)
These are TCX’s filed figures. The research desk says what they mean, against peers and its own years, with what to check next.
Research TCXPart of Serious. New accounts start with 30 days of Professional, free, no card.
2 of 10
What changed
The newest filing, what it moved, and when the next one is due.
SEC filingCompany statement
The newest accounts on file are the FY2025 annual report: 10-K, filed Mar 12, 2026, accession 0001437749-26-008009.
3 of 10
Quality
The returns the business earns on its capital, and the margins behind them.
SEC filingComputed
Tucows Inc: returns on capital and margins, each with its source
Figure
Value, source and document
Return on invested capital, after taxWhy n/a
The debt total on file was summed from short-term debt, long-term debt and lease obligations, and at least one of those was never captured. An absent term is spent as a zero inside that sum, and this balance sheet does not show the term is empty, so we will not build a leverage ratio, an enterprise value or a return on capital on it, or rank the company on one.
Book equity is zero or negative. Return on equity computed over it flips sign and can read as a strong positive on a loss-making company, so we will not show a number.
Debt to equity: FY2025: Filed shareholders equity is zero or below, so debt measured against it is not a measurement (n/m).
Interest cover: FY2025: Operating income is zero or below, so there is no operating profit to cover the interest bill and coverage is not meaningful (n/m).
Read from the filed balance sheet for each year, with the income statement of the same year supplying operating profit where a ratio needs it. Nothing here is a view on whether this company is sound.
5 of 10
Valuation context
What the market charges for it, against its own record and companies like it.
Market dataSEC filingComputed
Tucows Inc: what the market charges, each with its source
Figure
Value, source and document
Price to earningsWhy n/m
Earnings are zero or negative, so a price to earnings multiple is not meaningful. A negative P/E is not a cheap company and a large positive one from a near-zero denominator is not an expensive one.
n/mComputedClose of Oct 15, 2026 · FY2025 10-K, filed Mar 12, 2026, 0001437749-26-008009
P/E on trailing twelve months
183.06xComputedClose of Oct 15, 2026 · Trailing four quarters, each as known on the day; the quarterly filings are listed under Filings
Price to bookWhy n/m
Book equity is zero or negative, so a ratio measured against it (debt to equity, price to book) is not a measurement, and we will not show a number.
n/mComputedClose of Oct 15, 2026 · FY2025 10-K, filed Mar 12, 2026, 0001437749-26-008009
Price to sales
0.30xComputedClose of Oct 15, 2026 · FY2025 10-K, filed Mar 12, 2026, 0001437749-26-008009
Enterprise value to EBITWhy n/a
The debt total on file was summed from short-term debt, long-term debt and lease obligations, and at least one of those was never captured. An absent term is spent as a zero inside that sum, and this balance sheet does not show the term is empty, so we will not build a leverage ratio, an enterprise value or a return on capital on it, or rank the company on one.
n/aComputedClose of Oct 15, 2026 · FY2025 10-K, filed Mar 12, 2026, 0001437749-26-008009
Enterprise value to EBITDAWhy n/m
EBITDA is zero or negative, so a multiple of it is not meaningful.
n/mComputedClose of Oct 15, 2026 · FY2025 10-K, filed Mar 12, 2026, 0001437749-26-008009
Price to earnings over growthWhy n/m
Earnings are zero or negative, so a price to earnings multiple is not meaningful. A negative P/E is not a cheap company and a large positive one from a near-zero denominator is not an expensive one.
n/mComputedClose of Oct 15, 2026 · FY2025 10-K, filed Mar 12, 2026, 0001437749-26-008009
Earnings are zero or negative, so a price to earnings multiple is not meaningful. A negative P/E is not a cheap company and a large positive one from a near-zero denominator is not an expensive one.
We publish no fair value or price target of our own. Value TCX on your own assumptions in the DCF workbench, starting from the filed figures.
›Its own record, and companies like it
Valuation
What the market charges for Tucows Inc today, and the multiples it has carried. No value of ours: the figures are the filings’ and the market’s.
Tucows Inc: valuation
Share price
10.50 USD
Market capitalisation
117.4M USD
Enterprise value to EBITDA
n/m
Graham number
n/m
Diluted earnings per share, FY2025
-6.85 USD
Price to earnings on trailing twelve months, a different basis from the fiscal-year P/E above, since Oct 3, 2016: low 19.64x, median 41.82x, high 232.35x, latest 183.06x. 1,407 trading days with a meaningful ratio, 1,113 more on a loss and left out. Each close over the trailing twelve months of earnings as known that day: a quarter counts from the day it was filed.
Same industry (Software - Infrastructure) and size band (Micro, 50M to 300M), nearest in market value, net margin and current ratio. Each of those counts equally, by how many of the companies considered sit between the two on it. Closest first: the order is likeness and nothing else.
Free cash flow Net incomeProfit that arrives as cash stands level with net income; a gap year after year is worth reading about.
7 of 10
Filings
Every figure, the year it is for and the document it was read from.
SEC filingMarket data
The filed figures
Computed from the accounts this company filed with the SEC and, in a ratio with a price in it, the last close, dated on this page. Every filed figure below carries the fiscal year and the filing date its accounts were read from, and every blank carries the reason it is blank. Nothing here is a view on this company.
Tucows Inc.: the eight ratios, with the fiscal year and filing date behind each.
Figure
Value
Year
As of
n/m
FY2025
Oct 15, 2026
n/m Not meaningful for this company, such as a P/E on negative earnings or a bank's EV/EBIT.
FormulaShare price / earnings per share. Where the filing states no earnings per share this listing can be priced on, which is every 20-F and 40-F filer because theirs is stated per ordinary share, it is market capitalisation / net income: the same multiple, undiluted.
As ofThe close on Oct 15, 2026, over the filed figures of FY2025: a price is in this figure, and it moved after the filing.
n/a The debt total on file was summed from short-term debt, long-term debt and lease obligations, and at least one of those was never captured. An absent term is spent as a zero inside that sum, and this balance sheet does not show the term is empty, so we will not build a leverage ratio, an enterprise value or a return on capital on it, or rank the company on one.
Formula(Market capitalisation + total debt - cash) / operating income, or over the filing's own EBIT (income before tax + interest expense) where the filer tags no operating line, as Johnson & Johnson does not in any of its ten filed years.
As ofThe close on Oct 15, 2026, over the filed figures of FY2025: a price is in this figure, and it moved after the filing.
n/a The debt total on file was summed from short-term debt, long-term debt and lease obligations, and at least one of those was never captured. An absent term is spent as a zero inside that sum, and this balance sheet does not show the term is empty, so we will not build a leverage ratio, an enterprise value or a return on capital on it, or rank the company on one.
FormulaVendor trailing-twelve-month return on invested capital where one is published, which uses after-tax operating profit over total assets less current liabilities. Otherwise our own recompute: NOPAT / (shareholders equity + total debt - cash) x 100, where NOPAT is the filed operating profit after tax, or the filing's own EBIT after tax where the filer tags no operating line.
As ofThe filing date of the statements below, for FY2025.
n/a The filed cash flow statement reports no dividend paid at all. That is not the same as a filed zero, and we will not read it as one.
FormulaCommon dividends paid in the latest filed year / market capitalisation x 100. n/a where the filing cannot support it: a special or first-year payment, a total that mixes preferred dividends, or a cash-flow statement over 15 months old.
As ofThe close on Oct 15, 2026, over the filed figures of FY2025: a price is in this figure, and it moved after the filing.
Formula1.2 x working capital/assets + 1.4 x retained earnings/assets + 3.3 x EBIT/assets + 0.6 x market value of equity/total liabilities + 1.0 x revenue/assets
As ofThe close on Oct 15, 2026, over the filed figures of FY2025: a price is in this figure, and it moved after the filing.
FormulaAn eight-variable index of year-on-year changes in receivables, gross margin, asset quality, revenue, depreciation, overheads, leverage and accruals
As ofThe filing date of the statements below, for FY2025.
FormulaOne point each for: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, operating cash flow above net income, falling leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, rising asset turnover.
As ofThe filing date of the statements below, for FY2025.
The figures are computed from the accounts for fiscal 2025, the newest full year on file. 16 filed fiscal years on record, FY2009 to FY2025, from SEC EDGAR. Prices as of Oct 15, 2026. Ratios recomputed Oct 15, 2026. Two facts, because a recompute is not a fresh quote.
The year and the filing date name the statement each figure’s accounts are read from, and they stand even where the figure itself could not be computed: the line beneath a blank says what that statement did not carry. A figure’s name opens its formula and the filings behind it; a statement that names no SEC filing has no filing date, and reads n/a.
›Ten years of filed figures, year by year
Ten years of filed figures
10 filed fiscal years, FY2016 to FY2025, read from the annual reports Tucows Inc filed with the SEC. Each year names its filing. Amounts in USD, as filed.
Tucows Inc: revenue, earnings, free cash flow and returns, by fiscal year, with the filing each year was read from
Revenue, compound annual growth FY2016 to FY2025: 8.3%
Earnings: Earnings was not positive in both 2016 and 2025, so a compound rate across the window is not defined. Both figures are in the table.
Earnings per share: Earnings per share was not positive in both 2016 and 2025, so a compound rate across the window is not defined. Both figures are in the table.
Free cash flow: Free cash flow was not positive in both 2016 and 2025, so a compound rate across the window is not defined. Both figures are in the table.
Every figure in this section is a line of a filed annual statement or a ratio of two of them. Nothing here is estimated or smoothed. Earnings per share filed before a share split are put on today's share count, and say so. Nothing here is a verdict on the company.
8 of 10
Risks and guardrails
The accounting screens, the published tests, and the lines you can set to be told.
ComputedCompany statement
Tucows Inc: accounting screens and published tests, each with its source
Of 30 tests value investors published: 0 met, 21 not met, 9 we could not complete. Counts, never a score: a single figure would have to decide that meeting one investor’s criteria and meeting another’s are worth the same.
Which tests, by name(all 30)
Meets
None of the named tests.
Does not
Defensive investor (Benjamin Graham); Deep value; Large cap, low P/E; High F-score, low P/B (Joseph Piotroski); Three forensic scores; High returns and growth; Gross margin, turnover (Robert Novy-Marx); EV/EBITDA and coverage; High yield, low payout; Dividends and buybacks; Low beta, profitable; Near the 52-week low; Z-score and coverage (Edward Altman); Two thirds of NCAV (Benjamin Graham); High returns, low debt; Owner earnings yield; High return on tangibles; Low P/S, rising earnings (James O'Shaughnessy); Tangible book or below; Cash-flow yield and ROIC; Clean books, high ROIC
Not measured
Earnings yield and ROIC (Joel Greenblatt); Low PEG, low debt (Peter Lynch); ROIC at or above WACC; P/E times P/B (Benjamin Graham); Book or below, low debt (Walter Schloss); Cash-covered dividend; Cheapest quarter on P/E (David Dreman); Cheapest quarter on P/B (David Dreman); Low P/E, growth, yield (John Neff). A test with a figure we could not read is incomplete, never met and never failed.
Figures we could not read(17)
Debt to Equity: Filed shareholders equity is zero or below, so debt measured against it is not a measurement (n/m).
P/B Ratio: Book equity is zero or negative, so a ratio measured against it (debt to equity, price to book) is not a measurement, and we will not show a number.
P/E Ratio: Earnings are zero or negative, so a price to earnings multiple is not meaningful. A negative P/E is not a cheap company and a large positive one from a near-zero denominator is not an expensive one.
EV/EBIT: The debt total on file was summed from short-term debt, long-term debt and lease obligations, and at least one of those was never captured. An absent term is spent as a zero inside that sum, and this balance sheet does not show the term is empty, so we will not build a leverage ratio, an enterprise value or a return on capital on it, or rank the company on one.
Return on Invested Capital: The debt total on file was summed from short-term debt, long-term debt and lease obligations, and at least one of those was never captured. An absent term is spent as a zero inside that sum, and this balance sheet does not show the term is empty, so we will not build a leverage ratio, an enterprise value or a return on capital on it, or rank the company on one.
PEG Ratio: Earnings are zero or negative, so a price to earnings multiple is not meaningful. A negative P/E is not a cheap company and a large positive one from a near-zero denominator is not an expensive one.
Eps Growth 5Y: We do not hold this figure for this company, so there is nothing to show.
Return on Equity: Book equity is zero or negative. Return on equity computed over it flips sign and can read as a strong positive on a loss-making company, so we will not show a number.
EV/EBITDA: EBITDA is zero or negative, so a multiple of it is not meaningful.
Interest Coverage: Operating income is zero or below, so there is no operating profit to cover the interest bill and coverage is not meaningful (n/m).
Dividend Yield: We do not hold this figure for this company, so there is nothing to show.
Payout Ratio: We do not hold this figure for this company, so there is nothing to show.
ROIC-WACC Spread: The debt total on file was summed from short-term debt, long-term debt and lease obligations, and at least one of those was never captured. An absent term is spent as a zero inside that sum, and this balance sheet does not show the term is empty, so we will not build a leverage ratio, an enterprise value or a return on capital on it, or rank the company on one.
Price To Graham: Earnings are zero or negative, so a price to earnings multiple is not meaningful. A negative P/E is not a cheap company and a large positive one from a near-zero denominator is not an expensive one.
Dividend Coverage Ratio: We do not hold this figure for this company, so there is nothing to show.
Dividend Streak: We do not hold this figure for this company, so there is nothing to show.
Price Tangible Book: Book equity is zero or negative, so a ratio measured against it (debt to equity, price to book) is not a measurement, and we will not show a number.
A thesis is your reason for owning it, in your words, with the figures that must stay true. Checking those figures every night against the newest filed accounts, and telling you once when one breaks, is what the subscription adds.
›More on this company
What this cannot tell you
17 figures could not be read on this company, among them Debt to Equity, P/B Ratio, P/E Ratio. Each blank in the table above names the rest, with its reason. 9 named tests come back incomplete because of them, which is neither met nor missed.
And the one that is true of all of it: This is what the numbers say today. It cannot tell you the day one of them stops being true. Nothing here can, because the reasons are not written down.
Running this once is arithmetic on public documents and you are welcome to it. Writing down why you own each company, in your own words and with the numbers that have to stay true for it to hold, and then having those numbers re-checked every night against the newest filed accounts, and against the latest close where a rule watches a price, is Professional, the plan a new account starts on for 30 days, one trial per person. It writes to you the day one breaks, and stays quiet when nothing does. The check runs every night at 23:30 UTC. A filing is picked up the night after it is published.
ValueScreener · valuescreener.ai · Computed from accounts filed with the SEC by this company, read from EDGAR, and from dated closing prices. On this page a filed figure opens into its formula, its inputs and the statement, fiscal year and filing date it was read from, and a price into the day of its close. A figure that cannot show that trail says so.
A computation on accounts filed with the SEC, not a recommendation and not advice. Past filings do not indicate future results. Risk disclaimer.
Margin Notes
Once a week, what changed in the filings of US-listed companies, why it can matter to a thesis, and what deserves a closer review. Grounded in filings, not market noise.
Almost done. Before the first issue of Margin Notes we email this address once with a link to confirm, and nothing arrives unless you press it.
That address was not added. Check it and send it again. An address at one of the domains the standards reserve, example.com among them, is refused here because it cannot receive mail anywhere.
That is several sign-ups from this connection in an hour, so this one was not added. It resets on the hour.
With your permission, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity and HubSpot set cookies to measure how this site and the product are used, including recordings of sessions. Nothing is set unless you allow it. Privacy policy